Sunday, January 30, 2011

Governors Vs ObamaCare

The issue I have chosen to discuss is the idea of how a political problem can translate itself into an issue for companies, and how their HR departments will be forced to change their methods as a result. Here is the link to the Wall Street Journal article: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704754304576096151001973930.html


The passage of the “ObamaCare” Health Care plan in 2009 presented the country with many questions. How will it work? Who would be paying for it? Apart from the political firestorm created by one half of the political spectrum in this country (and one news network), companies were also faced with questions about how the new law would affect them. If the government is now providing health insurance for people, are private companies allowed to drop health care from their benefits package? Will there be some kind of tax incentive for a company to offer health care, and even so, why would they take that hit to their bottom line if their employees had a system already provided to them.
The Wall Street Journal article I’ve linked to here deals with the fact that many states, led by governors on both sides of the aisle, have joined in a lawsuit against the law, arguing for the principle of state’s rights. Governors of many of these states recently wrote a letter to the President claiming that the current language of the bill puts too many restrictions on states and forces them to pay too much of a share in health care costs without a source of revenue to cover those rising costs. This political issue will have a profound effect on how company’s structure their benefits, which will shape the way that HR departments are run in the future.